The biggest problems in critical rationalism, expressed as broadly as possible:
- too many are engaging in exegesis on, and history of, Popper’s thought.
- too few are progressively advancing critical rationalism.
The same could be said of most schools, and I do not intend to target anyone directly. That said, the work of historians of science and philosophy is invaluable, giving unseen insights into brilliant minds; however, Popper should only be valued because he, like many before him, paved the way for others. Of course, 1 is often not a problem, for younger generations often have had little understanding of the full implications of critical rationalism, and good historical scholarship can only help. That said, all things being equal, 1 is not as important as 2 in the long run, for critical rationalism will stagnate without constant criticism and revision in light of that criticism.
What can be done to advance critical rationalism? It is still in a savage state.