Teacher: Previously, we touched on how non-scientific statements play a bigger role than Popper first acknowledged. Gamma, you said yesterday that you disagreed with Sigma’s description of the scientific process?
Posts Tagged ‘analytic-synthetic distinction’
critical rationalism, duhem, empiricism, experiments, popper, quine on 11/07/2011 at 12:03 am
Gamma: Yes, I was getting at that there is a significant problem in Popper’s methodology of scientific progress, namely the very act of falsifying a theory. As we know from Duhem, no scientific theory can ever be conclusively refuted —